The planet is warming and the climate changing, we are doing it, it is bad and we can sort it out. I’m worried about this because the people who are going to feel the brunt of this are the same people I have to coerce into getting ready for school in the morning rather than play nurses or watch Peppa Pig.
We know the planet is warming by looking at the combination of surface and ocean temperatures. If you just look at the surface temperatures it looks as though there are confusing pauses in the warming, but that’s just because the weather is what transfers heat in the oceans to the surface, and weather comes and goes.
A lot of people think that the warming is natural, as we’ve been in and out of ice ages in the past. Or maybe it is changes in the intensity of the sun. Unfortunately the earth was cooling for 7000 years before we got in on the act. It’s not changes in the intensity of the sun, which has been going up and down with its 11 year cycle and been cooling – if it was the sun there would be less warming at night.
In fact, the only explanation out there that fits the observed data is that there are more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which have come from you and me. The physics tells us that some heat will be reflected back to Earth if there are more greenhouse gases and the science bods have directly measured that the heat that is escaping is at the wavelengths of the greenhouse gases.
We know the greenhouse gases, the main one being carbon dioxide, have resulted from us because the extra carbon dioxide is the sort you get from burning fossil fuels rather than that naturally abundant in the atmosphere.
Excluding impacts of increased war or exoduses or ocean turning more acid, and considering impacts out to the year 2200 only, Cambridge University in the UK suggest that each tonne of carbon dioxide emitted costs $100 down the line (including discounting the value of the future). Given we are emitting 35.6 billion tonnes per year, that means that we are causing $3.6 trillion damage per year. That’s not considering the impacts on the natural world and the mass extinctions we are already perpetrating.
And all we need to do is switch things off, buy less manufactured stuff, spend more time at home and get behind energy sources that don’t emit carbon dioxide for the remaining energy needed to keep us going until nuclear fusion comes along. It’s not hard, and at the same time it is very hard indeed.
Please do let me know what you think.
I’m no expert and I can only go on what I’ve read but this is just the tip of the ice burg (if they haven’t already melted). The whole process of climate change weather be it natural, human caused or human accelerated is a lot more complex than we all really think. There are too many inter connected variables to consider easily in in one field.
My personal feeling is that a largely overlooked contributor to climate change is geomagnetic reversal of the Earths core. Have you explored this natural process and it’s impacts on weather systems and o-zone layer thinning in the south Atlantic near the Amazon?
Just a thought.
Must admit that one has not crossed my path…where would you suggest I go to understand more? I remember reading something about this in the Fingerprints of the Gods, a book I read sometime in the 90s. Have to admit that it does sound a ;little whacky!
Something to get you started:
and of course the not so accurate Wikipedia (depending on who is writting) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal
Couple of quotes from the links:
Nasa: “The science shows that magnetic pole reversal is – in terms of geologic time scales – a common occurrence that happens gradually over millennia. While the conditions that cause polarity reversals are not entirely predictable – the north pole’s movement could subtly change direction, for instance – there is nothing in the millions of years of geologic record to suggest that any of the 2012 doomsday scenarios connected to a pole reversal should be taken seriously. A reversal might, however, be good business for magnetic compass manufacturers.”
Mother Nature Network: “Ozone holes, like that over Antarctica (which today are due to an entirely different cause related to man) could form as solar particles interact with the atmosphere in a cascade of chemical reactions. These ‘holes’ would not be permanent, but might be present on one- to 10-year timescales — arguably important enough to be a concern in terms of skin cancer rates,”